I might think that Lebby may be putting up a good offense.

Discussions on any and all things OU men's sports
User avatar
walt
Posts: 815
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 7:52 pm
2
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 202 times

I might think that Lebby may be putting up a good offense.

Post by walt »

Not being a fan of Jeff Lebby as OU's OC I might get more friendly for his offense, that is assuming Lebby can come close to the Tulsa in the future as his offense looked pretty good.
"
Brent Venables will be the next "B" of a heck OU Head Coach."
Zgeo
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:37 pm
2
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Post by Zgeo »

Yes the Lebby offense was good against Tulsa….
RussC
Posts: 1517
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:25 pm
2
Has thanked: 549 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Post by RussC »

In my ideal world, OU and Lebby have fantastic success together for another 2-3 years, at which point Lebby takes a head coaching job somewhere, and OU gets pick of the litter to replace him.
#Mentally In Portal
User avatar
OU Guy
Posts: 12143
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 7:22 pm
2
Location: OKC
Has thanked: 2166 times
Been thanked: 1891 times

Post by OU Guy »

Lebby can make me both happy and sad within 15 minutes. When he uncorks the offense they look unstoppable. And then he can go in a shell and just perplex me. I think he’s a great coach but sometimes outsmarts himself trying to put square peg in round hole.
In Brent I Trust :D
OldTimer
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:01 am
2
Location: Healdton, Oklahoma
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Post by OldTimer »

I’m just not a fan of the HUNH. It’s nice to have it in your repertoire in case you need it, but you better be able to prove you can slow it down and play smash mouth football if you need to. So far he hasn’t really shown he can do that.
“Come now, let us reason together “
User avatar
WishBone
Posts: 2582
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2021 8:38 am
2
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 472 times

Post by WishBone »

OldTimer wrote:I’m just not a fan of the HUNH. It’s nice to have it in your repertoire in case you need it, but you better be able to prove you can slow it down and play smash mouth football if you need to. So far he hasn’t really shown he can do that

OT please help me out here ...what are you saying?
Opinions are still "OK" ...Correct?
BixSooner
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 6:30 pm
2
Been thanked: 17 times

Post by BixSooner »

HUNH = Hurry Up No Huddle
BixSooner
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 6:30 pm
2
Been thanked: 17 times

Post by BixSooner »

Zgeo is spot on, in that we look great against Tulsa.

OU’s offense did not exactly run wild against Tulsa, while throwing for a ton. Will the better teams be able to limit our downfield throws while putting a minimum amount of bodies in the box to stop the run? And will we still be able to put (lots of) points on the board?

Not to change the subject, but to me, this is such a huge game this week. We were 3 and 0 last year, with our D looking pretty salty only to see us get exposed on the 4th, and 5th, and 6th games. We need to keep up the good work on the defensive side.
User avatar
walt
Posts: 815
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 7:52 pm
2
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 202 times

Post by walt »

BixSooner wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:29 pm Zgeo is spot on, in that we look great against Tulsa.

OU’s offense did not exactly run wild against Tulsa, while throwing for a ton. Will the better teams be able to limit our downfield throws while putting a minimum amount of bodies in the box to stop the run? And will we still be able to put (lots of) points on the board?

Not to change the subject, but to me, this is such a huge game this week. We were 3 and 0 last year, with our D looking pretty salty only to see us get exposed on the 4th, and 5th, and 6th games. We need to keep up the good work on the defensive side.
I'm pretty sure OU's offense did exactly run wild against Tulsa :confusedplus: My thinking is that the coaches gave lots of 2nd teamers play a lot and gave them some of the injuries a little rest of a few of the 1st teamers. We might show up pretty strong against Cincy, as they haven't showed a lot of power. We will see.
"
Brent Venables will be the next "B" of a heck OU Head Coach."
Rough Rider
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:21 am
2
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 69 times

Post by Rough Rider »

I see a lot to like in this offense that Lebby put together but I have to say I'm not a fan of Lebby's playcalling. Running game doesn't appear where it should be right now to me either.
Poster formerly known as tbmguy
User avatar
WishBone
Posts: 2582
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2021 8:38 am
2
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 472 times

Post by WishBone »

Running game doesn't appear where it should be right now to me either.........That would be Demarcos Call,and as for this whole thread.as long as Lebby is meeting BV's expectations,I'm pretty sure he'll be there as long as he wants.Fan of him or not ; the guy is our OC.(for now)
Opinions are still "OK" ...Correct?
User avatar
Oklahombre
Posts: 1515
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:43 pm
2
Has thanked: 843 times
Been thanked: 331 times

Post by Oklahombre »

So far they are loading the box to stop the run. Ain't working, just opening up the passing game and Lebby is destroying them.

We will see what Cinncy throws at us... Meanwhile... :dillon: :dillon: :dillon: :dude:
RussC
Posts: 1517
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:25 pm
2
Has thanked: 549 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Post by RussC »

Oklahombre wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:28 pm So far they are loading the box to stop the run. Ain't working, just opening up the passing game and Lebby is destroying them.

We will see what Cinncy throws at us... Meanwhile... :dillon: :dillon: :dillon: :dude:
Hombre: what do you think about the idea of taking our TEs off the field and replacing with wideouts? TEs just not in our game plan anyway except for blocking (and I’m not seeing the TEs do much run game blocking). Meanwhile we seem to be very deep in playmaking WRs that need more snaps.
#Mentally In Portal
User avatar
Oklahombre
Posts: 1515
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:43 pm
2
Has thanked: 843 times
Been thanked: 331 times

Post by Oklahombre »

RussC wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 5:44 pm
Oklahombre wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:28 pm So far they are loading the box to stop the run. Ain't working, just opening up the passing game and Lebby is destroying them.

We will see what Cinncy throws at us... Meanwhile... :dillon: :dillon: :dillon: :dude:
Hombre: what do you think about the idea of taking our TEs off the field and replacing with wideouts? TEs just not in our game plan anyway except for blocking (and I’m not seeing the TEs do much run game blocking). Meanwhile we seem to be very deep in playmaking WRs that need more snaps.
Oh my Russ...You asked the wrong person to answer anything about what the coaches run. It's just way over my head until someone points it out to me.

I do understand the Wishbone offense. That has about three plays to understand..

Maybe a coaching-type poster can answer you. @Shelstin ??
Rough Rider
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:21 am
2
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 69 times

Post by Rough Rider »

WishBone wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:14 pm Running game doesn't appear where it should be right now to me either.........That would be Demarcos Call,and as for this whole thread.as long as Lebby is meeting BV's expectations,I'm pretty sure he'll be there as long as he wants.Fan of him or not ; the guy is our OC.(for now)
Yeah, I don’t really mean that I want to run Lebby off. Like I said, I like the offense he’s put together and no matter who it is there will be something to complain about. Lebby’s play calling though… that’s where I’ll complain.
Poster formerly known as tbmguy
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in